Logo image
Back
Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Observation in Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma Patients With Normal Hearing: A Retrospective International Multicenter Study
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Observation in Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma Patients With Normal Hearing: A Retrospective International Multicenter Study

Bardia Hajikarimloo, Othman Bin-Alamer, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Mariam Ishaque, Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar, Selcuk Peker, Yavuz Samanci, Isabelle Pelcher, Sabrina Begley, …
Neurosurgery
16 Sep 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003734
PMID: 40956102

Abstract

Observation Stereotactic radiosurgery Surveillance Gamma Knife Acoustic neuroma Vestibular schwannoma
The therapeutic approach for small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) with normal hearing function remains controversial, with limited comparative data regarding hearing outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or observation (OBS). We evaluated the serviceable hearing preservation, loss of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class A hearing, and tumor control (TC) across individuals with Koos grade I and II VSs and normal hearing at presentation who underwent SRS or OBS. In this multicenter international study, we retrospectively analyzed the hearing, radiological, and neurological outcomes of patients who underwent SRS (SRS group) or OBS (OBS group). The cohorts were matched using propensity scores based on age, sex, tumor volume, pure-tone average, and speech discrimination score at a 1:1 ratio without replacement. After matching, each group comprised 57 patients. The median follow-up was 49 and 37 months for the SRS and the OBS groups, respectively (P = .3). The 5- and 9-year serviceable hearing preservation rates in the SRS group were 76.2% and 42.4% vs 56.1% and 16.8% in the OBS group (P = .17). Class A preservation occurred in 57.9% (33/57) of the SRS and 52.6% (30/57) of the OBS cohorts (P = .70). Regarding the TC rates, SRS was associated with significantly higher TC rates (P < .0001). We found that SRS is significantly superior regarding TC and provided noninferior hearing outcomes compared with OBS in VS patients with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class A hearing at presentation. Therefore, we suggest performing SRS in individuals with VS and normal hearing function.

Metrics

3 Record Views

Details

Logo image