Files and links (1)
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0, Open
Journal article
Supreme Court v. Necropolitics: The Chaotic Judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil
Health and human rights, v 23(1), pp 151-162
01 Jun 2021
PMID: 34194209
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Worldwide, governments have reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic with emergency orders and policies restricting rights to movement, assembly, and education that have impacted daily lives and livelihoods in profound ways. But some leaders, such as President Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, have resisted taking such steps, denying the seriousness of the pandemic and sabotaging local control measures, thereby compromising population health. Facing one of the world’s highest rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths, multiple political actors in Brazil have resorted to judicialization to advance the right to health and other protections in the country. Responding to this litigation has provided the country’s Supreme Court an opportunity to assertively confront and counter the executive’s necropolitics. In this article, we probe the malleable form and the constitutional basis of the Supreme Court’s decisions, assessing their impact on the separation of powers, on the protection of human rights (for example, on those of prisoners, indigenous peoples, and essential workers), and relative to the implementation of evidence-based interventions (for example, lockdowns and vaccination). While the court’s actions open up a distinct legal-political field (sometimes called “supremocracy”)—oscillating between progressive imperatives, neoliberal valuations, and conservative decisions—the capacity of the judiciary to significantly address systemic violence and to robustly advance human rights remains to be seen.
Metrics
14 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Supreme Court v. Necropolitics
- Creators
- João Biehl - Princeton UniversityLucas E. A. Prates - Princeton UniversityJoseph J. Amon - Drexel University
- Publication Details
- Health and human rights, v 23(1), pp 151-162
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Number of pages
- 12
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Community Health and Prevention
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000663183200013
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85106641129
- Other Identifier
- 991019168428304721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Public, Environmental & Occupational Health