Logo image
Systematic Review of the Clinimetric Properties of Laboratory- and Field-Based Aerobic and Anaerobic Fitness Measures in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Systematic Review of the Clinimetric Properties of Laboratory- and Field-Based Aerobic and Anaerobic Fitness Measures in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Astrid C. Balemans, Maria A. Fragala-Pinkham, Nancy Lennon, Deborah Thorpe, Roslyn N. Boyd, Margaret E. O’Neil, Kristie Bjornson, Jules G. Becher, Annet J. Dallmeijer and Margaret E O'Neil
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, v 94(2), pp 287-301
Feb 2013
PMID: 23022091

Abstract

Aerobic exercise Cerebral palsy Exercise test Psychometrics Rehabilitation Reliability and validity
To systematically evaluate the level of evidence of the clinimetric properties of measures of aerobic and anaerobic capacity used for children with cerebral palsy (CP). A systematic search of databases PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO through April 2011 was performed. Two independent raters identified and examined studies that reported laboratory- or field-based measures of maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity in children with CP aged 5 to 14 years. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used by 2 independent raters to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included clinimetric studies and to identify measures used in these studies. Twenty-four studies that used a maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity measure were identified. Five studies reported clinimetric properties for 5 measures (2 aerobic and 3 anaerobic measures). Methodologic quality was excellent in 3 studies, showing good validity and reliability of field-based aerobic (Shuttle Run Test) and anaerobic (Muscle Power Sprint Test) measures. The studies on laboratory-based measures were rated fair, mainly because of inadequate statistics. The level of evidence was strong for good validity and reliability of the field-based tests. The level of evidence was unknown for validity and low to moderate for good reliability of laboratory-based tests. There is a paucity of research on the clinimetric properties of measurement instruments to assess aerobic and anaerobic capacity for children with CP. Further clinimetric studies of laboratory-based measures in children with CP at all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels, and clinimetric studies of field-based measures in children who are classified as GMFCS levels III to V are required.

Metrics

5 Record Views
32 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Rehabilitation
Sport Sciences
Logo image