Logo image
Back
Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups

LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, v 31(5), 101409
Oct 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101409
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101409View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Restricted

Abstract

The large, positive correlation between speaking time and leader emergence is well-established. As such, some authors have argued for a babble hypothesis of leadership, suggesting that only the quantity of speaking, not its quality, determines leader emergence. However, previous tests of this notion may have been problematic. Some studies have asserted a causal effect of speaking time on leader emergence based on experimental studies, but have limited participant communication, access to reliable information, or both. Other studies have used more ecologically valid designs, but have not always controlled for relevant participant traits or roles, suggesting potential endogeneity effects. Testing the babble hypothesis thus requires a study that is both ecologically valid and supports strong inference. The current study fills that gap and finds that speaking time retains its direct effect on leader emergence when accounting for intelligence, personality, gender, and the endogeneity of speaking time.

Metrics

211 Record Views
57 citations in Web of Science
60 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Management
Psychology, Applied
Logo image