Logo image
The Baltimore HEARS Pilot Study: An Affordable, Accessible, Community-Delivered Hearing Care Intervention
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Baltimore HEARS Pilot Study: An Affordable, Accessible, Community-Delivered Hearing Care Intervention

Carrie L Nieman, Nicole Marrone, Sara K Mamo, Joshua Betz, Janet S Choi, Kevin J Contrera, Roland J Thorpe, Jr, Laura N Gitlin, Elizabeth K Tanner, Hae-Ra Han, …
The Gerontologist, v 57(6), pp 1173-1186
10 Nov 2017
PMID: 27927734
url
https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article-pdf/57/6/1173/24346121/gnw153.pdfView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw153View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Aged Baltimore Delivery of Health Care - methods Depression - etiology Depression - physiopathology Depression - prevention & control Female Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration Hearing Aids - supply & distribution Hearing Loss - diagnosis Hearing Loss - etiology Hearing Loss - psychology Hearing Loss - therapy Humans Male Middle Aged Minority Health - statistics & numerical data Pilot Projects Quality of Life Time-to-Treatment
Age-related hearing loss negatively affects health outcomes, yet disparities in hearing care, such as hearing aid use, exist based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Recent national efforts highlight reduction of hearing care disparities as a public health imperative. This study a) describes a community engagement approach to addressing disparities, b) reports preliminary outcomes of a novel intervention, and c) discusses implementation processes and potential for wide-scale testing and use. This was a prospective, randomized control pilot, with a 3-month delayed treatment group as a waitlist control, that assessed feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a community-delivered, affordable, and accessible intervention for older adults with hearing loss. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, comparing immediate and delayed groups, and pooled to compare the cohort's pre- and 3-month post-intervention results. All participants completed the study (n = 15). The program was highly acceptable: 93% benefited, 100% would recommend the program, and 67% wanted to serve as future program trainers. At 3 months, the treated group (n = 8) experienced fewer social and emotional effects of hearing loss and fewer depressive symptoms as compared to the delayed treatment group (n = 7). Pooling 3-month post-intervention scores (n = 15), participants reported fewer negative hearing-related effects (effect size = -0.96) and reduced depressive symptoms (effect size = -0.43). The HEARS (Hearing Equality through Accessible Research & Solutions) intervention is feasible, acceptable, low risk, and demonstrates preliminary efficacy. HEARS offers a novel, low-cost, and readily scalable solution to reduce hearing care disparities and highlights how a community-engaged approach to intervention development can address disparities.

Metrics

7 Record Views
60 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Gerontology
Logo image