Logo image
The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure

John E. Mathieu, Margaret M. Luciano, Lauren D'Innocenzo, Elizabeth A. Klock and Jeffery A. LePine
Organizational research methods, v 23(3), pp 399-431
01 Jul 2020
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119840801View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Business & Economics Management Psychology Psychology, Applied Social Sciences
Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001) advanced a theory and framework of team processes that has garnered much attention and guided numerous investigations. They proposed that 10 first-order constructs (e.g., strategy formulation, coordination, conflict management) would map to three second-order constructs (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal). Despite the popularity of this framework, we are unaware of any validated multiitem measures of the team processes they identified. Accordingly, we develop and demonstrate content and construct validity of 50-, 30-, and 10-item versions of a survey measure of team processes. Using data from over 700 teams, we test Marks et al.'s higher-order model and find results that are largely consistent with both their 10 first-order dimensions and the 10:3 second-order framework. Using samples of global virtual knowledge teams and health care employees, we provide evidence of the discriminant validity of our team process measure versus a measure of team empowerment. We provide recommendations for the use of these measures in future research and practice and encourage their use as part of a portfolio of measures of team processes.

Metrics

14 Record Views
94 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Management
Psychology, Applied
Logo image