Logo image
The Inner Workings of the Intersectional Discrimination Index: (Re)Assessing the Internal Validity of the Anticipated, Day-to-Day, and Major Discrimination Measures
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The Inner Workings of the Intersectional Discrimination Index: (Re)Assessing the Internal Validity of the Anticipated, Day-to-Day, and Major Discrimination Measures

Joao L. Bastos, Luwam T. Gebrekristos, Sannisha K. Dale, Ana Maria del Rio-Gonzalez, Greta R. Bauer and Ayden I. Scheim
Stigma and health (Washington, D.C.)
20 Jan 2025

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Psychology, Social Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology Psychology Social Sciences
Of the three Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI) scales, only the anticipated discrimination measure (InDI-A) has been subjected to factorial analysis to date. This study expands upon such evaluation by assessing the internal validity of the lifetime day-to-day (InDI-D) and major discrimination (InDI-M) scales, in addition to further examining the anticipated discrimination measure. For each InDI scale, administered to diverse Canadian (n = 1,065) and U.S. (n = 1,518) samples in 2016, we determined the number of underlying factors, estimated item loadings, and assessed residual correlations. We also examined the correlation between the InDI-D and InDI-M, and the degree to which the three InDI measures are invariant across Canada and the United States. We show that the InDI is characterized by three good-fitting unidimensional measures, moderate to strong loadings, and five pairs of potentially redundant items. There is considerable but not excessive overlap between the InDI-D and InDI-M, and estimates of anticipated, day-to-day, and major discrimination are invariant across countries. Given these findings, we suggest that the InDI measures have good internal validity both in Canada and the United States. To further develop the scales, future studies should evaluate their scalar properties and external validity concerning health. Additionally, these studies should determine whether the measures provide discrimination estimates that are meaningfully comparable across groups at the intersections of different social statuses and positions.

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#10 Reduced Inequalities

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Social
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image