Logo image
The Promise and Pitfalls of Assembled Institutions: Lessons from the Global Environment Facility and UNAIDS
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Promise and Pitfalls of Assembled Institutions: Lessons from the Global Environment Facility and UNAIDS

Erin R. Graham
Global policy, v 8(1), pp 52-61
01 Feb 2017
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12359View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Government & Law International Relations Political Science Social Sciences
Contemporary global governance architecture has been described as fragmented, incoherent, and inefficient. The mandates of prominent international organizations (IOs) often overlap and coordination is regarded more as the exception than the rule. In this context, international institutions designed with an explicit coordination mandate hold significant promise. These assembled institutions (AIs), like the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and UNAIDS, formally incorporate IOs in their designs and seek to coordinate and bring coherence to their work in a given issue area. Although praised for their bold and innovative designs, little scholarly work has assessed the success of these institutions in fulfilling coordination mandates. The paper introduces AIs as an organizational form and sheds light on two challenges they face that provide barriers to coordination. First, concerns regarding status and material losses may cause relevant IOs to resist coordination despite ostensibly opting in to participate in the assembled institution. Second, the governing bodies of assembled institutions are weak relative to the prominent IOs incorporated in their designs. The home governing bodies of these institutions often do little to reinforce the importance of coordination, hampering performance. These challenges are illustrated in the case of the GEF and UNAIDS.

Metrics

16 Record Views
9 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
International Relations
Political Science
Logo image