Logo image
Back
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis

John R. Fowler, John P. Gaughan and Asif M. Ilyas
Clinical orthopaedics and related research, v 469(4), pp 1089-1094
01 Apr 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5
PMID: 20963527
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified),  Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Orthopedics Science & Technology Surgery
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly diagnosed compression neuropathy of the upper extremity. Current AAOS recommendations are to obtain a confirmatory electrodiagnostic test in patients for whom surgery is being considered. Ultrasound has emerged as an alternative confirmatory test for CTS; however, its potential role is limited by lack of adequate data for sensitivity and specificity relative to electrodiagnostic testing. In this meta-analysis we determined the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CTS. A PubMed/MEDLINE search identified 323 articles for review. After applying exclusion criteria, 19 articles with a total sample size of 3131 wrists were included for meta-analysis. Three groups were created: a composite of all studies, studies using clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, and studies using electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard. The composite sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of CTS, using all studies, were 77.6% (95% CI 71.6-83.6%) and 86.8% (95% CI 78.9-94.8%), respectively. The wide variations of sensitivities and specificities reported in the literature have prevented meaningful analysis of ultrasound as either a screening or confirmatory tool in the diagnosis of CTS. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CTS are 77.6% and 86.8%, respectively. Although ultrasound may not replace electrodiagnostic testing as the most sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of CTS given the values reported in this meta-analysis, it may be a feasible alternative to electrodiagnostic testing as the first-line confirmatory test. Level III, systematic review of Level III studies. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Metrics

13 Record Views
222 citations in Web of Science
241 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Orthopedics
Surgery
Logo image