Most life cycle studies of biofuels have not examined the impact of process chemicals and enzymes, both necessary inputs to biochemical production and which vary depending upon the technology platform (feedstock, pretreatment and hydrolysis system). We examine whether this omission is warranted for sugar-platform technologies. We develop life cycle ('well-to-tank') case studies for a corn dry-mill and for one 'mature' and two near-term lignocellulosic ethanol technologies. Process chemical and enzyme inputs contribute only 3% of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for corn ethanol. Assuming considerable improvement compared to current enzyme performance, the inputs for the near-term lignocellulosic technologies studied are found to be responsible for 30%-40% of fossil energy use and 30%-35% of GHG emissions, not an insignificant fraction given that these models represent technology developers' nth plant performance. Mature technologies which assume lower chemical and enzyme loadings, high enzyme specific activity and on-site production utilizing renewable energy would significantly improve performance. Although the lignocellulosic technologies modeled offer benefits over today's corn ethanol through reducing life cycle fossil energy demand and GHG emissions by factors of three and six, achieving those performance levels requires continued research into and development of the manufacture of low dose, high specific activity enzyme systems. Realizing the benefits of low carbon fuels through biological conversion will otherwise not be possible. Tracking the technological performance of process conversion materials remains an important step in measuring the life cycle performance of biofuels.
The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol
Creators
Heather L. MacLean - University of Toronto
Sabrina Spatari - Drexel University
Publication Details
Environmental research letters, v 4(1), pp 014001-014001 (10)
Publisher
Iop Publishing Ltd
Number of pages
10
Grant note
Government of Ontario
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI)
AUTO21 Network Centre of Excellence
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering
Web of Science ID
WOS:000265878500001
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-66749118861
Other Identifier
991019167621904721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: