Journal article
The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process
Design studies, v 22(3), pp 283-295
2001
Abstract
This paper presents the results of studying a single designer using protocol analyses and examines the implications of the results on studies of design thinking. It contrasts two types of protocols: concurrent protocols and retrospective protocols. The results indicate that concurrent and retrospective protocols both produce very similar outcomes in terms of exploring the process-oriented aspects of designing. As a result, it is argued there is no associated interference with the ongoing design process when using concurrent protocols. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Metrics
1 Record Views
Details
- Title
- The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process
- Creators
- John S. Gero - The University of SydneyHsien Hui Tang - The University of Sydney
- Publication Details
- Design studies, v 22(3), pp 283-295
- Number of pages
- 13
- Grant note
- University of Sydney (http://data.elsevier.com/vocabulary/SciValFunders/501100001774) Australian Research Council (http://data.elsevier.com/vocabulary/SciValFunders/501100000923)
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-0035341926
- Other Identifier
- 991022157475004721