Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology
Objectives
Current understanding of the dose-response relationship between occupational noise and hearing loss is based on cross-sectional studies prior to the widespread use of hearing protection, and with limited data regarding noise exposures below 85 dBA. We report on the hearing loss experience of a unique cohort of industrial workers, with daily monitoring of noise inside of hearing protection devices.
Methods
At an industrial facility, workers exhibiting accelerated hearing loss were enrolled in a mandatory programme to monitor daily noise exposures inside of hearing protection. We compared these noise measurements (as time-weighted L-AVG) to interval rates of high-frequency hearing loss over a 6-year period using a mixed-effects model, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results
Workers' high-frequency hearing levels at study inception averaged more than 40 dB Hearing threshold level (HTL). Most noise exposures were less than 85 dBA (mean L-AVG 76 dBA, IQR 74-80 dBA). We found no statistical relationship between LAvg and high-frequency hearing loss (p=0.53). Using a metric for monthly maximum noise exposure did not improve model fit.
Conclusions
At-ear noise exposures below 85 dBA did not show an association with risk of high-frequency hearing loss among workers with substantial past noise exposure and hearing loss at baseline. Therefore, effective noise control to below 85 dBA may lead to significant reduction in occupational hearing loss risk in such individuals. Further research is needed on the dose-response relationship of noise and hearing loss in individuals with normal hearing and little prior noise exposure.
The dose-response relationship between in-ear occupational noise exposure and hearing loss
Creators
Peter M. Rabinowitz - Yale University
Deron Galusha - Yale University
Christine Dixon-Ernst - Alcoa (United States)
Jane E. Clougherty - University of Pittsburgh
Richard L. Neitzel - University of Michigan
Publication Details
Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), v 70(10), pp 716-721
Publisher
Bmj Publishing Group
Number of pages
6
Grant note
R01OH008641 / NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH; United States Department of Health & Human Services; Centers for Disease Control & Prevention - USA; National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH)
R01AG026291 / NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute on Aging (NIA)
1 R01 OH008641-01A2 / CDC/NIOSH; United States Department of Health & Human Services; Centers for Disease Control & Prevention - USA; National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Dana and David Dornsife School of Public Health; Drexel University; Environmental and Occupational Health
Web of Science ID
WOS:000324421200008
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84884586293
Other Identifier
991020099918304721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: