Logo image
The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review

Rusty Souleymanov, Dario Kuzmanovic, Zack Marshall, Ayden I. Scheim, Mikiki Mikiki, Catherine Worthington and Margaret (Peggy) Millson
BMC medical ethics, v 17(1), 25
29 Apr 2016
PMID: 27129927
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0108-2View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Biomedical Social Sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Social Sciences - Other Topics Social Sciences, Biomedical Ethics Medical Ethics Social Sciences
Background: Drug user networks and community-based organizations advocate for greater, meaningful involvement of people with lived experience of drug use in research, programs and services, and policy initiatives. Community-based approaches to research provide an opportunity to engage people who use drugs in all stages of the research process. Conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) with people who use drugs has its own ethical challenges that are not necessarily acknowledged or supported by institutional ethics review boards. We conducted a scoping review to identify ethical issues in CBPR with people who use drugs that were documented in peer-reviewed and grey literature. Methods: The search strategy focused on three areas; community-based research, ethical issues, and drug use. Searches of five academic databases were conducted in addition to a grey literature search, hand-searching, and consultation with organizational partners and key stakeholders. Peer reviewed literature and community reports published in English between 1985 and 2013 were included, with initial screening conducted by two reviewers. Results: The search strategy produced a total of 874 references. Twenty-five references met the inclusion criteria and were included in our thematic analysis. Five areas were identified as important to the ethics of CBPR with people who use drugs: 1) participant compensation, 2) drug user perspectives on CBPR, 3) peer recruitment and representation in CBPR, 4) capacity building, and 5) participation and inclusion in CBPR. Conclusions: We critically discuss implications of the emerging research in this field and provide suggestions for future research and practice.

Metrics

9 Record Views
66 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Ethics
Medical Ethics
Social Sciences, Biomedical
Logo image