Logo image
The food restriction wars: Proposed resolution of a primary battle
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The food restriction wars: Proposed resolution of a primary battle

Joanna Y. Chen, Simar Singh and Michael R. Lowe
Physiology & behavior, v 240, pp 113530-113530
15 Oct 2021
PMID: 34273346
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc7047710View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Behavioral Sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Psychology Psychology, Biological Science & Technology Social Sciences
Research regarding the definition and consequences of dieting has generated controversy for years. This controversy has spilled over into the public domain, especially as eating disorders and obesity have become more prevalent. One of the earliest and longest-lasting controversies involves the restrained eating framework, which was originally developed by Herman and Polivy and also strongly influenced the development of the cognitivebehavioral model of bulimia nervosa. An alternative framework for understanding the role of dieting in nonclinical and clinical groups, called the Three-Factor Model of Dieting, took a sharply different approach to defining, and understanding the impact of, dieting. This paper provides a brief historical review of the development of these divergent perspectives and updates the Three Factor Model's critical distinction between restraining eating to prevent over-consumption and dieting to lose weight. We suggest that three historical trends impacted the development of Restraint Theory in ways that unfairly impugned dieting for weight control: the emergence of the new eating disorders of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, a population-based increase in loss of control eating and a population-based increase in obesity. This update is aimed in part at encouraging new research to reconcile ongoing, unresolved issues between Herman and Polivy's restrained eating model and the Three-Factor model of Dieting model. Such research might also contribute to the public's understanding of the pros and cons of dieting and to new approaches to treating eating disorders and obesity.

Metrics

10 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Behavioral Sciences
Psychology, Biological
Logo image