Logo image
The politics of human rights trade sanctions: evidence from the African Growth and Opportunity Act
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The politics of human rights trade sanctions: evidence from the African Growth and Opportunity Act

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, v 30(1), p227
Mar 2024
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231193165View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Scholars contend that embedding human rights conditionality in trade agreements can improve human rights. We argue that human rights interests may collide with trade, investment, and security interests. We examine these claims in the context of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a unilateral trade preference program with robust human rights conditions, created in 2000 by the United States for up to 49 potentially eligible sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) states. US decisions to terminate AGOA beneficiary status are determined strongly by US trade, investment, and security interests. The country's human rights record, including state-sponsored killings and other violations of physical integrity rights, has a less consistent and weaker effect.

Metrics

2 Record Views
2 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
International Relations
Logo image