Logo image
To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics

Farrel J. Buchinsky and Neil K. Chadha
Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, v 157(6), pp 915-918
01 Dec 2017
PMID: 29192853
url
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599817739260View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817739260View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Otorhinolaryngology Science & Technology Surgery
In biomedical research, it is imperative to differentiate chance variation from truth before we generalize what we see in a sample of subjects to the wider population. For decades, we have relied on null hypothesis significance testing, where we calculate P values for our data to decide whether to reject a null hypothesis. This methodology is subject to substantial misinterpretation and errant conclusions. Instead of working backward by calculating the probability of our data if the null hypothesis were true, Bayesian statistics allow us instead to work forward, calculating the probability of our hypothesis given the available data. This methodology gives us a mathematical means of incorporating our prior probabilities from previous study data (if any) to produce new posterior probabilities. Bayesian statistics tell us how confidently we should believe what we believe. It is time to embrace and encourage their use in our otolaryngology research.

Metrics

17 Record Views
24 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Otorhinolaryngology
Surgery
Logo image