Logo image
To have or to be? The interplay between knowledge structure and market identity in knowledge-based alliance formation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

To have or to be? The interplay between knowledge structure and market identity in knowledge-based alliance formation

Angeloantonio Russo, Clodia Vurro and Rajiv Nag
Research policy, v 48(3), pp 571-583
Apr 2019
url
http://hdl.handle.net/2434/600633View

Abstract

Alliance formation Emerging industry Knowledge structure Knowledge-based alliance Market identity
•The framework explains the moderating effect of market identity on knowledge-based alliances formation.•Congruence between internal knowledge structure characteristics and market identity turns into higher alliance rate.•Value chain position and market status emerge as two distinct dimensions of market identity.•Market status can hurt firms facing a misalignment between knowledge structure and value chain position. We explore how a firm’s knowledge structure characteristics and market identity—as reflected in its position in the industry value chain and market status—influence knowledge-based alliance (KBA) formation. We propose that a firm’s propensity to form KBAs is affected by the congruence (or misalignment) between its knowledge structure characteristics (i.e., knowledge depth and scope) and the role it plays in the industry, as demanded by its position in the value chain. We further argue that while a firm’s market status can amplify the positive effect of the congruence, thereby enhancing a firm’s proclivity to form KBAs, being prominent can also hurt a firm when it faces a misalignment between its knowledge structure characteristics and externally induced expectations related to its value chain position. We validate our arguments using panel data on 1051 firm-year observations for 197 firms patenting in the global fuel cell industry for the period 1999–2009. By developing a richer understanding of the relationship between a firm’s knowledge-based resources and KBA formation, we answer the call for a better understanding of how and when firms can leverage their internal knowledge configurations to improve their proclivity to form alliances.

Metrics

22 Record Views
19 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Management
Logo image