Logo image
Trends in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in the United States From 1993 to 2009 Increasing Complexity of Patients and Procedures
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Trends in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in the United States From 1993 to 2009 Increasing Complexity of Patients and Procedures

Arnold J. Greenspon, Jasmine D. Patel, Edmund Lau, Jorge A. Ochoa, Daniel R. Frisch, Reginald T. Ho, Behzad B. Pavri and Steven M. Kurtz
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, v 60(16), pp 1540-1545
16 Oct 2012
PMID: 22999727
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.017View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (Publisher-Specific) Open

Abstract

Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems Cardiovascular System & Cardiology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology
Objectives This study sought to define contemporary trends in permanent pacemaker use by analyzing a large national database. Background The Medicare National Coverage Determination for permanent pacemaker, which emphasized single-chamber pacing, has not changed significantly since 1985. We sought to define contemporary trends in permanent pacemaker use by analyzing a large national database. Methods We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify permanent pacemaker implants between 1993 and 2009 using the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification procedure codes for dual-chamber (DDD), single-ventricular (VVI), single-atrial (AAI), or biventricular (BiV) devices. Annual permanent pacemaker implantation rates and patient demographics were analyzed. Results Between 1993 and 2009, 2.9 million patients received permanent pacemakers in the United States. Overall use increased by 55.6%. By 2009, DDD use increased from 62% to 82% (p < 0.001), whereas single-chamber ventricular pacemaker use fell from 36% to 14% (p = 0.01). Use of DDD devices was higher in urban, nonteaching hospitals (79%) compared with urban teaching hospitals (76%) and rural hospitals (72%). Patients with private insurance (83%) more commonly received DDD devices than Medicaid (79%) or Medicare (75%) recipients (p < 0.001). Patient age and Charlson comorbidity index increased over time. Hospital charges ($2011) increased 45.3%, driven by the increased cost of DDD devices. Conclusions There is a steady growth in the use of permanent pacemakers in the United States. Although DDD device use is increasing, whereas single-chamber ventricular pacemaker use is decreasing. Patients are becoming older and have more medical comorbidities. These trends have important health care policy implications. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1540-5) (c) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Metrics

13 Record Views
424 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Logo image