Logo image
Turning up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Turning up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation

Carolyn M Hendriks, John S Dryzek and Christian Hunold
Political studies, v 55(2), pp 362-383
Jun 2007
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non-partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non-partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non-partisan forums.

Metrics

8 Record Views
130 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#10 Reduced Inequalities

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
International Relations
Political Science
Logo image