Logo image
Back
Update on the limited sensitivity of computed tomography relative to RT-PCR for COVID-19: a systematic review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Update on the limited sensitivity of computed tomography relative to RT-PCR for COVID-19: a systematic review

Clarissa Martin, Nina Cheng, Bryant Chang, Namrata Arya, Michael Joseph Diaz, Keldon Lin, Muhammad Umair, Joseph Waller and Travis Henry
Polish journal of radiology, v 87(1), pp E381-E391
01 Jan 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118238
PMID: 35979154
url
https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118238View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Science & Technology
Purpose: The global and ongoing COVID-19 outbreak has compelled the need for timely and reliable methods of detec-tion for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been widely accepted as a reference standard for COVID-19 diagnosis, several early studies have suggested the superior sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) in identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a previous systematic review, we stratified studies based on risk for bias to evaluate the true sensitivity of CT for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study revisits our prior analysis, incorporating more current data to assess the sensitivity of CT for COVID-19. Material and methods: The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 2020, and 25 April 2021. Exclusion criteria included lack of specification regarding whether the study co-hort was adult or paediatric, whether patients were symptomatic or asymptomatic, and not identifying the source of RT-PCR specimens. Ultimately, 62 studies were included for systematic review and were subsequently stratified by risk for bias using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment tool. Sensitivity data were extracted for random effects meta-analyses. Results: The average sensitivity for COVID-19 reported by the high-risk-of-bias studies was 68% [CI: 58, 80; range: 38-96%] for RT-PCR and 91% [CI: 87, 96; range: 47-100%] for CT. The average sensitivity reported by the low-risk-of-bias studies was 84% [CI: 0.75, 0.94; range: 70-97%] for RT-PCR and 78% [CI: 71, 0.86; range: 44-92%] for CT. Conclusions: On average, the high-risk-of bias studies underestimated the sensitivity of RT-PCR and overestimated the sensitivity of CT for COVID-19. Given the incorporation of recently published low-risk-of-bias articles, the sensitivities according to low-risk-of-bias studies for both RT-PCR and CT were higher than previously reported.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image