Logo image
Use and Value of Ordering Emergency Electroencephalograms and Videoelectroencephalographic Monitoring After Business Hours in a Children's Hospital: 1-Year Experience
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Use and Value of Ordering Emergency Electroencephalograms and Videoelectroencephalographic Monitoring After Business Hours in a Children's Hospital: 1-Year Experience

Sanjeev V. Kothare, Divya S. Khurana, Ignacio Valencia, Joseph J. Melvin and Agustin Legido
Journal of child neurology, v 20(5), pp 416-419
May 2005
PMID: 15968926

Abstract

Policies of administration, availability, and utility of ordering emergency electroencephalograms (EEGs) during nonbusiness hours vary widely among different EEG laboratories. In an attempt to explore further the importance of performing such emergency procedures in children, we analyzed the utility of not only emergency EEGs but also emergency long-term bedside EEGs and emergency video-EEGs at our institution in 1 year. The number of EEG studies performed in 1 year at our neurophysiology laboratory was 1821: 1212 routine EEGs, 387 24-hour ambulatory EEGs, 81 video-EEGs, and 141 long-term bedside EEGs. The number of emergency studies during the same period of time was 32 (1.8% of the total studies): 18 emergency EEGs, 8 emergency long-term bedside EEGs, and 6 emergency video-EEGs. The reasons for ordering the 18 emergency EEGs included the evaluation of (1) altered mental status ( n = 10), (2) paroxysmal movement (including cluster of seizures) ( n = 6), and (3) prolonged febrile or afebrile seizures prior to being discharged on a weekend ( n = 2). The eight emergency long-term bedside EEGs were done to evaluate (1) altered mental status ( n = 6) and (2) frequently occurring paroxysmal events ( n = 2). Four of the eight emergency long-term bedside EEGs were done after an abnormal emergency EEG. The six emergency video-EEGs were done to evaluate frequently occurring paroxysmal events ( n = 5) and altered mental status ( n = 1). Overall, emergency EEGs and emergency video-EEGs were useful in decision making in 30 of 32 (94%) studies. This might be related to the fact that a neurologist approved all of the studies. Appropriate strategies need to be developed to make this essential service available for patient care. ( J Child Neurol 2005;20:416—419).

Metrics

11 Record Views
22 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Pediatrics
Logo image