Journal article
Validity of self-reported driving: It all depends on how and when you ask
Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, v 116, 103417
Jan 2026
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
The accuracy of self-reported driving behaviors, particularly in relation to real-world risky driving in realistic settings over time, remains unclear. This study aimed to examine whether self-reports remain consistent over time, whether they predict real-world driving behaviors, and whether that relationship changes over time. Self-reported driving behaviors included a global rating score of driving ability and four components of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (lapses, errors, ordinary violations, and aggressive violations). At three separate timepoints [baseline (N = 47), 6-month (N = 43), and 12-month (N = 38)], we obtained these self-ratings along with real-world risky behaviors recorded using the Lytx video telematics platform over a 28-day period. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine whether self-reported driving behaviors changed over time and whether they predicted real-world driving. Neither self-reported nor objective driving behaviors significantly changed over time. Aggressive violations, specifically at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, and ordinary violations at the 12-month visit significantly predicted real-world risky driving. Consistent with the literature, these findings indicate that self-reported driving behaviors do not change over time. Aggressive violations, reported at follow-up visits, may be the most indicative of overall real-world risky driving. Their value at follow-up visits specifically may be because participants are more attuned to these behaviors after an initial period of observation. Additionally, aggressive violations are commissive behaviors with a strong negative emotional valence, which could cause them to be remembered better than omissive behaviors and those with a more neutral emotional valence. These results can potentially influence driving assessments and interventions.
Metrics
18 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Validity of self-reported driving: It all depends on how and when you ask
- Creators
- Nicole J. Eng - Drexel UniversityKathryn N. Devlin - Drexel UniversityJocelyn Ang - Drexel UniversityMolly Split - Drexel UniversityRachel Lyons - Drexel UniversityMaria T. Schultheis - Drexel University
- Publication Details
- Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, v 116, 103417
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Number of pages
- 12
- Grant note
- National Institutes of Health: 5R01HD096066-05
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [5R01HD096066-05] .
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology); Biology
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001605864200002
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-105020855624
- Other Identifier
- 991022124261804721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- Psychology, Applied
- Transportation