Objective:To assess physician prognosis and treatment recommendations for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and to determine the effect of providing physicians a validated prognostic score.Methods:A written survey with 2 ICH scenarios was completed by practicing neurologists and neurosurgeons. Selected factors were randomly varied (patient older vs middle age, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 7T vs 11, and presence vs absence of a validated prognostic score). Outcomes included predicted 30-day mortality and recommendations for initial treatment intensity (6-point scale ranging from 1 = comfort only to 6 = full treatment).Results:A total of 742 physicians were included (mean age 52, 32% neurosurgeons, 17% female). Physician predictions of 30-day mortality varied widely (mean [range] for the 4 possible combinations of age and GCS were 23% [0%-80%], 35% [0%-100%], 48% [0%-100%], and 58% [5%-100%]). Treatment recommendations also varied widely, with responses encompassing the full range of response options for each case. No physician demographic or personality characteristics were associated with treatment recommendations. Providing a prognostic score changed treatment recommendations, and the effect differed across cases. When the prognostic score suggested 0% chance of functional independence (76-year-old with GCS 7T), the likelihood of treatment limitations was increased (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.33) compared to no prognostic score. Conversely, if the score suggested a 66% chance of independence (63-year-old with GCS 11), treatment limitations were less likely (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.88).Conclusions:Physicians vary substantially in ICH prognostic estimates and treatment recommendations. This variability could have a profound effect on life and death decision-making and treatment for ICH.
Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhage
Creators
Darin B. Zahuranec - University of Michigan
Angela Fagerlin - VA Center for Clinical Management Research
Brisa N. Sanchez - University of Michigan
Meghan E. Roney - Brown University
Bradford B. Thompson - University of Michigan
Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis - University of Michigan
Lewis B. Morgenstern - University of Michigan
Publication Details
Neurology, v 86(20), pp 1864-1871
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Number of pages
8
Grant note
CTSA: UL1RR024986 / Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research
KAG038731 / National Institute on Aging; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute on Aging (NIA)
UL1RR024986 / NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
K23AG038731 / NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Web of Science ID
WOS:000376782000007
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84969195204
Other Identifier
991020100212104721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool: