Logo image
Variation by Specialty in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection in Women
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Variation by Specialty in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection in Women

Robert S Wigton, J Craig Longenecker, Teresa J Bryan, Connie Parenti, Stephen D Flach and Thomas G Tape
Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, v 14(8), pp 491-494
Aug 1999
PMID: 10491234
url
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05398.xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Brief Reports
To determine practicing physicians' strategies for diagnosing and managing uncomplicated urinary tract infection, we surveyed physicians in general internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine in four states. Responses differed significantly by respondents' specialty. For example, nitrofurantoin was the antibiotic of first choice for 46% of obstetricians, while over 80% in the other specialties chose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Most surveyed said they do not usually order urine culture, but the percentage who do varied by specialty. Most use a colony count of 10 5 colony-forming units or more for diagnosis although evidence favors a lower threshold, and 70% continue antibiotic therapy even if the culture result is negative. This survey found considerable variation by specialty and also among individual physicians regarding diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infection and also suggests that some of the new information from the literature has not been translated to clinical practice.

Metrics

5 Record Views
37 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image