Logo image
Vertebral Body Stapling versus Bracing for Patients with High-Risk Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Vertebral Body Stapling versus Bracing for Patients with High-Risk Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis

Laury Cuddihy, Aina J Danielsson, Patrick J Cahill, Amer F Samdani, Harsh Grewal, John M Richmond, M J Mulcahey, John P Gaughan, M Darryl Antonacci and Randal R Betz
BioMed research international, v 2015(2015)
01 Jan 2015
PMID: 26618169
url
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/438452View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Adolescent Braces Child Disease Progression Female Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Risk Scoliosis - surgery Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery Treatment Outcome
We report a comparison study of vertebral body stapling (VBS) versus a matched bracing cohort for immature patients with moderate (25 to 44°) idiopathic scoliosis (IS). 42 of 49 consecutive patients (86%) with IS were treated with VBS and followed for a minimum of 2 years. They were compared to 121 braced patients meeting identical inclusion criteria. 52 patients (66 curves) were matched according to age at start of treatment (10.6 years versus 11.1 years, resp. [P = 0.07]) and gender. For thoracic curves 25-34°, VBS had a success rate (defined as curve progression <10°) of 81% versus 61% for bracing (P = 0.16). In thoracic curves 35-44°, VBS and bracing both had a poor success rate. For lumbar curves, success rates were similar in both groups for curves measuring 25-34°. In this comparison of two cohorts of patients with high-risk (Risser 0-1) moderate IS (25-44°), in smaller thoracic curves (25-34°) VBS provided better results as a clinical trend as compared to bracing. VBS was found not to be effective for thoracic curves ≥35°. For lumbar curves measuring 25-34°, results appear to be similar for both VBS and bracing, at 80% success.

Metrics

2 Record Views
27 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Logo image