Logo image
When snowball sampling leads to an avalanche of fraudulent participants in qualitative research
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

When snowball sampling leads to an avalanche of fraudulent participants in qualitative research

Justine S Sefcik, Zachary Hathaway and Rose Ann DiMaria-Ghalili
International journal of older people nursing, v 18(6), e12572
Nov 2023
PMID: 37632269
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843676View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND Fraudulent research participants create negative consequences for the rigour and soundness of research. AIMSA case study is presented from a qualitative study where the research team believed several fraudulent participants fabricated information during an interview about being a caregiver for a person living with dementia and chronic wounds. MATERIALS & METHODS Participants were recruited through a free online research registry. Individual semi-structured interviews were held virtually. RESULTS The study was paused after the nurse scientist with qualitative methodology experience identified that participants were giving illogical and repetitive responses across interviews. The team developed a revised screening tool to help reduce fraudulent participants from enrolling in the study. None of the data collected were used for analysis. DISCUSSION Information is provided on how the team dealt with the situation, lessons learned for future studies, and recommendations for gerontological nurse researchers. CONCLUSION Researchers should be aware that some participants are misrepresenting themselves for financial incentives and this can compromise the soundness of findings. Thorough screening tools are one way to identify and prevent fraud.

Metrics

22 Record Views
25 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
Logo image