Wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted 3-dimensional analysis (WATS) markedly improves detection of esophageal dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus: analysis from a prospective multicenter community-based study
M S Smith, E Ikonomi, R Bhuta, N Iorio, R D Kataria, V Kaul and S A Gross
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC V4.0, Open
Abstract
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Barrett Esophagus - diagnosis Biopsy - methods Biopsy - statistics & numerical data Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Diagnostic Errors Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis Esophageal Mucosa - diagnostic imaging Esophageal Mucosa - pathology Esophagus - diagnostic imaging Esophagus - pathology Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Surgical Instruments Young Adult
The 4-quadrant forceps biopsy (FB) protocol for identifying Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal dysplasia (ED) suffers from poor sensitivity due to significant sampling error. We investigated the benefit of wide-area transepithelial sampling with 3-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS) used adjunctively to the combination of random and targeted FB in the detection of ED, and as a secondary outcome, BE. In this multicenter prospective trial, community endoscopists at 21 sites utilized WATS as an adjunct to both targeted and random FB in patients undergoing BE screening and surveillance. Investigators alternated taking FB and WATS samples first. WATS specimens were analyzed at CDx Diagnostics (Suffern, NY) while FB samples were analyzed by each site's regular pathologists. Data were de-identified and then aggregated for analysis. Of 12,899 patients enrolled, FB identified 88 cases of ED, and WATS detected an additional 213 cases missed by FB. These 213 cases represented an absolute increase of 1.65%, raising the yield from 0.68% to 2.33%. Adding WATS to FB increased the overall detection of ED by 242% (95% CI: 191%-315%). Fewer than 61 patients needed to be tested with WATS to identify an additional case of ED. The combination of random and targeted FB identified 1,684 cases of BE, and WATS detected an additional 2,570 BE cases. The absolute incremental yield of adding WATS to FB is 19.9%, increasing the rate of detection from 13.1% to 33%. Adding WATS to FB increased the overall detection of BE by 153% (95% CI: 144-162%). The number needed to test with WATS in order to detect an additional case of BE was 5. Whether FB or WATS was done first did not impact the results. In this study, comprised of the largest series of patients evaluated with WATS, adjunctive use of the technique with targeted and random FB markedly improved the detection of both ED and BE. These results underscore the shortcomings of FB in detecting BE-associated neoplasia, which can potentially impact the management and clinical outcomes of these patients.
Wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted 3-dimensional analysis (WATS) markedly improves detection of esophageal dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus: analysis from a prospective multicenter community-based study
Creators
M S Smith - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West & Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospitals, New York, NY, USA
E Ikonomi - Hahnemann University Hospital
R Bhuta - Temple University Hospital
N Iorio - SUNY Upstate Medical University
R D Kataria - Temple University Hospital
V Kaul - University of Rochester Medical Center
S A Gross - NYU Langone Health
Publication Details
Diseases of the esophagus, v 32(3), 099
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Web of Science ID
WOS:000461137500007
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85062619484
Other Identifier
991021876911404721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services