Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nutrition & Dietetics Psychology, Clinical Science & Technology Psychiatry Psychology Social Sciences
ObjectiveAlthough exercise is generally considered healthy, many individuals engage in maladaptive exercise (e.g., compulsive in nature). Several definitions of maladaptive exercise exist, leading to multiple, varied assessment tools; assuming homogeneity across these assessments contributes to low consensus in etiological models.MethodWe used a Jaccard Index to quantify content overlap among 15 commonly-used self-report instruments measuring maladaptive exercise, with 31 features identified across 224 items.ResultsThe most common features were exercise to control weight/shape and to avoid negative affect (both included in 9/15 instruments), or compensate for calories consumed (8/15 instruments). Overlap among instruments was low (.206) and no features were common across all instruments.ConclusionsFindings generally support theoretical models of exercise in eating pathology. However, instruments most commonly used to assess maladaptive exercise measure heterogenous content. Careful consideration should be taken when comparing findings derived from differing instruments, when synthesizing literature on maladaptive exercise, and when selecting instruments to measure specific maladaptive exercise features.Public SignificanceMany, varied, tools exist for the assessment of maladaptive exercise (e.g., compulsive or compensatory) in the context of eating disorders. Assuming homogeneity across tools contributes to low consensus in the field. We used a Jaccard Index to quantify content overlap among 15 self-report instruments measuring maladaptive exercise. The most commonly used instruments measure heterogenous content. Careful consideration should be taken when synthesizing literature and selecting instruments to use in research.
Working out measurement overlap in the assessment of maladaptive exercise
Creators
Elizabeth W. Lampe - Drexel University, Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
Katherine Schaumberg - University of Wisconsin–Madison
David Kolar - University of Regensburg
Kathryn Coniglio - Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marita Cooper - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Danielle A. N. Chapa - University of Pittsburgh
Sasha Gorrell - University of California, San Francisco
Publication Details
The International journal of eating disorders, v 57(3), pp 558-567
Publisher
Wiley
Number of pages
10
Grant note
National Institute of Mental Health; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
Web of Science ID
WOS:001142095800001
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85182461962
Other Identifier
991021861177304721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Psychiatry
Psychology
Psychology, Clinical
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services