Letter/Communication
Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018)
The American psychologist, v 73(7), pp 932-932
Oct 2018
PMID: 30284892
Abstract
In this reply to Rossiter (2018), we note that the goal of developing Journal Article Reporting Standards has been to specify the kinds of information that should be provided to the readers of scientific articles in order to allow maximal understanding of the work being reported-in the case of psychometrics, information that demonstrates the underlying adequacy of the measures used in the research being reported. Although we illustrate some kinds of items that might be utilized to make these demonstrations, the illustrations are not proscriptive. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018)
- Creators
- Mark Appelbaum - Department of Psychology, University of California, San DiegoHarris Cooper - Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke UniversityRex B Kline - Department of Psychology, Concordia UniversityEvan Mayo-Wilson - Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins UniversityArthur M Nezu - Department of Psychology, Drexel UniversityStephen M Rao - Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic
- Publication Details
- The American psychologist, v 73(7), pp 932-932
- Publisher
- United States
- Resource Type
- Letter/Communication
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000446233100007
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85054346517
- Other Identifier
- 991014877668904721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Psychology, Multidisciplinary