Letter/Communication
Response: The Mobile Itineraries of Knowledge-scapes
Transfers, v 9(1)
01 Jun 2019
Abstract
This special section elucidates intersections between the historiography of mobilities and the interdisciplinary field of mobilities research. The articles highlight relationships between mobilities and stabilization, circulation and place-making, deterritorialization and reterritorialization. This response essay seeks to dispel three myths about mobility studies: (1) that it is purely about the contemporary world, rather than the historical dimensions of mobile processes; (2) that it focuses solely on material phenomenon of physical transport (i.e., of things and people) and ignores the movement of ideas, knowledge, and culture; and (3) that it is purely about “flows” and “circulation” and has little to teach us about friction, resistances, blockages, or uneven power relations. The most important intersections of the histories of mobilities and the field of mobility studies can be found in the ways in which each emphasizes power differentials, blockages, friction, and the relation between mobilities and immobilities.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Response
- Creators
- Mimi Sheller - Drexel University
- Publication Details
- Transfers, v 9(1)
- Publisher
- Berghahn Journals
- Resource Type
- Letter/Communication
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Sociology
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000472778400007
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-85068042041
- Other Identifier
- 991014877935504721
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- History