Logo image
Reversible neuroinhibition does not require a thermal mechanism
Letter/Communication   Open access

Reversible neuroinhibition does not require a thermal mechanism

Norman M. Spivak, Mark E. Schafer and Alexander Bystritsky
Brain stimulation, v 13(1), pp 262-262
01 Jan 2020
PMID: 31582302
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.09.007View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Abstract

Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Science & Technology
We wish to respond to the recent publication by Darrow et al. titled “Reversible Neuroinhibition by Focused Ultrasound is mediated by a Thermal Mechanism [1].” Specifically, we wish to alert the larger transcranial Focused Ultrasound Sonication (tFUS) community regarding inducing reversible neuroinhibition without thermal changes. Prior research has clearly demonstrated neuroinhibition without the temperature change suggested by Darrow et al. In a study attempting to suppress regional cortical excitability in rabbits, fMRI BOLD was used to monitor neural activity in the visual cortex after LED light stimulation [2]. Focused Ultrasound with a tone burst duration of 0.5 msec, Pulse repetition frequency = 100 Hz, and Isppa = 3.3 W/cm2 successfully suppressed the BOLD signal caused by light stimulation. The authors initially set out to confirm the accuracy of their targeting in rabbits using MR thermometry [3]. [first paragraph]

Metrics

9 Record Views
6 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences
Logo image