Logo image
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?: despite evidence to the contrary, the American Economic Review concluded that all was well with its archive
Other   Open access   Peer reviewed

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?: despite evidence to the contrary, the American Economic Review concluded that all was well with its archive

Bruce D McCullough
Economics. The open-access, open-assessment e-journal, v 12(1), pp 1-13
2018
url
https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-52View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

In 2011, the Annual Report of the Editor of the American Economic Review reported that the journal’s data-code archive was functioning well, and no changes were made to the archive rules. This was based on an audit of the archive that the Editor had commissioned. In point of fact, all was not well with the archive: the archive did not support the publication of reproducible research. The rules for the archive should have been changed and were not; thus the American Economic Review continued to publish articles that were not reproducible. The cause of reproducible research was set back many years. Currently it appears that the AER intends to reproduce articles prior to publication; this would be a horrible mistake.

Metrics

17 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Economics
Logo image