Logo image
What's meant by explainable model: A Scoping Review
Preprint   Open access

What's meant by explainable model: A Scoping Review

Mallika Mainali and Rosina O Weber
18 Jul 2023
url
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2307.09673View
Preprint (Author's original)arXiv.org - Non-exclusive license to distribute Open

Abstract

Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
We often see the term explainable in the titles of papers that describe applications based on artificial intelligence (AI). However, the literature in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) indicates that explanations in XAI are application- and domain-specific, hence requiring evaluation whenever they are employed to explain a model that makes decisions for a specific application problem. Additionally, the literature reveals that the performance of post-hoc methods, particularly feature attribution methods, varies substantially hinting that they do not represent a solution to AI explainability. Therefore, when using XAI methods, the quality and suitability of their information outputs should be evaluated within the specific application. For these reasons, we used a scoping review methodology to investigate papers that apply AI models and adopt methods to generate post-hoc explanations while referring to said models as explainable. This paper investigates whether the term explainable model is adopted by authors under the assumption that incorporating a post-hoc XAI method suffices to characterize a model as explainable. To inspect this problem, our review analyzes whether these papers conducted evaluations. We found that 81% of the application papers that refer to their approaches as an explainable model do not conduct any form of evaluation on the XAI method they used.

Metrics

15 Record Views

Details

Logo image