Logo image
The effect of fraud assessment documentation structure on auditors' ability to identify control weaknesses: The moderating role of reviewer experience
Working paper   Open access

The effect of fraud assessment documentation structure on auditors' ability to identify control weaknesses: The moderating role of reviewer experience

Christopher P. Agoglia, Cathy A. Beaudoin and George T. Tsakumis
Social Science Research Network : SSRN
Aug 2006
pdf
The effect of fraud assessment documentation structure on auditors' ability to identify control weaknesses_ The moderating role of reviewer experience73.58 kBDownloadView
Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.925672View
Open

Abstract

Review process Control environment Fraud Control weakness Audit documentation Task-specific experience
The current regulatory environment, brought on by recent high-profile audit failures, expands the auditor's role in detecting fraud. For example, auditors must now provide an opinion on clients' internal controls, addressing their effectiveness at preventing or detecting fraud. While the structure of workpaper documentation has been shown to affect audit workpaper preparers' assessments of overall fraud risk, prior research has not addressed the role their reviewers' experience plays in mitigating documentation structure effects. Our study matches audit workpaper preparers with reviewers to investigate whether reviewer task-specific experience moderates the effect of fraud assessment documentation structure on the audit review team's ability to identify the presence of significant control weaknesses. Consistent with expectations, we find that preparers who are required to document components of their fraud assessments provided more favorable (and lower quality) assessments of significant control weaknesses than those using either a supporting or balanced documentation structure. More importantly, results indicate that reviewer task-specific experience moderated the effect of documentation structure on reviewers' identification of control weaknesses such that experienced reviewers compensated more for the effect of component documentation than reviewers with less experience. Our results suggest that experienced reviewers are better able to overcome challenges presented by documentation structure and more effectively assess the impact of control weaknesses than their less experienced counterparts. These results provide support for new regulations emphasizing the role of experience during the control assessment process.

Metrics

14 File views/ downloads
16 Record Views

Details

Logo image