Logo image
Accuracy and limitations of the bond polarizability model in modeling of Raman scattering from molecular dynamics simulations
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Accuracy and limitations of the bond polarizability model in modeling of Raman scattering from molecular dynamics simulations

Atanu Paul, Maya Rubenstein, Anthony Ruffino, Stefan Masiuk, Jonathan E. Spanier and Ilya Grinberg
The Journal of chemical physics, v 161(6)
14 Aug 2024
url
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07448View

Abstract

Calculation of Raman scattering from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations requires accurate modeling of the evolution of the electronic polarizability of the system along its MD trajectory. For large systems, this necessitates the use of atomistic models to represent the dependence of electronic polarizability on atomic coordinates. The bond polarizability model (BPM) is the simplest such model and has been used for modeling the Raman spectra of molecular systems but has not been applied to solid-state systems. Here, we systematically investigate the accuracy and limitations of the BPM parameterized from the density functional theory results for a series of simple molecules, such as CO2, SO2, H2S, H2O, NH3, and CH4; the more complex CH2O, CH3OH, CH3CH2OH, and thiophene molecules; and the BaTiO3 and CsPbBr3 perovskite solids. We find that BPM can reliably reproduce the overall features of the Raman spectra, such as shifts of peak positions. However, with the exception of highly symmetric systems, the assumption of non-interacting bonds limits the quantitative accuracy of the BPM; this assumption also leads to qualitatively inaccurate polarizability evolution and Raman spectra for systems where large deviations from the ground state structure are present.

Metrics

14 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Chemistry, Physical
Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
Logo image