Logo image
Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development

Richardson Dilworth
Social sciences (Basel), v 9(10), pp 1-12
01 Oct 2020
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100183View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Social Sciences Social Sciences - Other Topics Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Over the past decade there has been a concerted attempt among a growing group of authors to bring together the political science subfields of urban politics and American political development (APD). In this paper, I look at specifically how the comparative study of different cities and urban areas might contribute to this intellectual project, beginning with a brief illustrative comparison of Philadelphia and Montreal. I then place that comparison in the larger context of recent literature in postcolonialism, assemblage, and planetary urbanization, which I use to establish what I call an aggregation strategy for constructing variables-or, alternately, for denying the very existence of variables. I then suggest how my aggregation strategy could improve upon urban regime analysis, and inform new directions in studies at the intersection of urban politics and APD.

Metrics

12 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Logo image