Logo image
Evaluating the Impact of the Clean Heat Program on Air Pollution Levels in New York City
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluating the Impact of the Clean Heat Program on Air Pollution Levels in New York City

Lyuou Zhang, Mike Z He, Elizabeth A Gibson, Frederica Perera, Gina S Lovasi, Jane E Clougherty, Daniel Carrión, Kimberly Burke, Dustin Fry and Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou
Environmental health perspectives, v 129(12), pp 127701-127701
Dec 2021
PMID: 34878319
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
pdf
Evaluating the Impact of the Clean Heat Program on Air Pollution Levels in New York City457.77 kBDownloadView
PDF Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp9976View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)access removed by US government, 1 Dec 2025Open Access (License Unspecified) Restricted
url
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9976View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Air Pollution - analysis Air Pollution - prevention & control Hot Temperature New York City
BACKGROUND: Despite a vast air pollution epidemiology literature to date and the recognition that lower-socioeconomic status (SES) populations are often disproportionately exposed to pollution, there is little research identifying optimal means of adjusting for confounding by SES in air pollution epidemiology, nor is there a strong understanding of biases that may result from improper adjustment. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a conceptualization of SES and a review of approaches to its measurement in the U.S. context and discuss pathways by which SES may influence health and confound effects of air pollution. We explore bias related to measurement and operationalization and identify statistical approaches to reduce bias and confounding. DISCUSSION: Drawing on the social epidemiology, health geography, and economic literatures, we describe how SES, a multifaceted construct operating through myriad pathways, may be conceptualized and operationalized in air pollution epidemiology studies. SES varies across individuals within the contexts of place, time, and culture. Although no single variable or index can fully capture SES, many studies rely on only a single measure. We recommend examining multiple facets of SES appropriate to the study design. Furthermore, investigators should carefully consider the multiple mechanisms by which SES might be operating to identify those SES indicators that may be most appropriate for a given context or study design and assess the impact of improper adjustment on air pollution effect estimates. Last, exploring model contraction and expansion methods may enrich adjustment, whereas statistical approaches, such as quantitative bias analysis, may be used to evaluate residual confounding. https://doi.

Metrics

22 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Toxicology
Logo image