Psychology Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental Social Sciences
Objective: This meta-analysis advances a framework to understand correspondence among units of analysis of the social processing construct within Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Method: As requested for this special issue, eligible studies cited an RDoC-initiative paper or mentioned RDoC in the abstract, title, or keywords were empirical and peer reviewed, and described a correlation or regression analysis (r, beta, or odds ratio) between two different units of analysis in the social processing domain in youth. We examined the frequency (descriptive statistics) and magnitude of correspondence between unit-pairs (random effects models), and predefined moderators (meta-regression). Results: Eight of the twenty-eight possible unit-by-unit pairs were identified, with subjective-by-behavior units being the most common. Of those, only subjective-by-circuit had significant correspondence between units. Moderator analysis revealed that the age and diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder moderated correspondence between subjective-by-circuit units of analysis, and that a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder moderated correspondence between subjective-by-gene units of analysis. Younger ages and inclusion of either diagnostic group reduced correspondence. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the RDoC initiative has generated limited research within the social processing domain across units of analysis in youth to date. Moreover, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded studies do not appear to be biased toward supporting the RDoC framework. However, the limited number of included studies precludes the generalizability of these findings and underscores the need for further research. Despite this, results suggest that the NIMH model for providing standard batteries of measurement tools may effectively reduce spurious correlations between subjective-by-behavior units of analysis.
Meta-Analysis of the RDoC Social Processing Domain across Units of Analysis in Children and Adolescents
Creators
Tessa Clarkson - Temple University
Erin Kang - Stony Brook University
Nicole Capriola-Hall - University of Alabama
Matthew D. Lerner - Stony Brook University
Johanna Jarcho - Temple University
Mitchell J. Prinstein - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Publication Details
Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology, v 49(3), pp 297-321
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Number of pages
25
Grant note
R01 MH110585 / NIMH; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders (NARSAD) Young Investigator Award
381283 / Simons Foundation (SFARI)
24890 / NARSAD Young Investigator Award; NARSAD
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
A.J. Drexel Autism Institute
Web of Science ID
WOS:000500448200001
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85075947860
Other Identifier
991021861852004721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical
Psychology, Developmental
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services