Journal article
Predictors of contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, v 148(6), pp 2720-2726.e2
Dec 2014
PMID: 25218533
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
The study objective was to identify the predictors of outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients from the Reduction in cardiovascular Events by acaDesine in patients undergoing CABG (RED-CABG) trial. Despite the increasing risk profile of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, morbidity and mortality have remained low, and identification of the current predictors of adverse outcomes may permit new treatments to further improve outcomes.
The RED-CABG trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that determined that acadesine did not reduce adverse events in moderately high-risk patients undergoing nonemergency coronary artery bypass grafting. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or the need for mechanical support for severe left ventricular dysfunction through postoperative day 28. Logistic regression modeling with stepwise variable selection identified which prespecified baseline characteristics were associated with the primary outcome. A second logistic model included intraoperative variables as potential covariates.
The 4 independent preoperative risk factors predictive of the composite end point were (1) a history of heart failure (odds ratio, 2.9); (2) increasing age (odds ratio, 1.033 per decade); (3) a history of peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio, 1.6); and (4) receiving aspirin before coronary artery bypass grafting (odds ratio, 0.5), which was protective. The duration of the cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio, 1.8) was the only intraoperative variable that contributed to adverse outcomes.
Patients who had heart failure and preserved systolic function had a similar high risk of adverse outcomes as those with low ejection fractions, and new approaches may mitigate this risk. Recognition of patients with excessive atherosclerotic burden may permit perioperative interventions to improve their outcomes. The contemporary risks of coronary artery bypass grafting have changed, and their identification may permit new methods to improve outcomes.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Predictors of contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes
- Creators
- Richard D Weisel - Toronto General HospitalNancy Nussmeier - Massachusetts General HospitalMark F Newman - Duke Medical CenterRonald G Pearl - Stanford UniversityAndrew S Wechsler - Drexel UniversityGiuseppe Ambrosio - University of PerugiaBertram Pitt - University of Michigan–Ann ArborRobert M Clare - Duke Medical CenterKaren S Pieper - Duke Medical CenterLinda Mongero - Columbia University Medical CenterTammy L Reece - Duke Medical CenterTerrence M Yau - Toronto General HospitalStephen Fremes - Sunnybrook Health Science CentrePhilippe Menasché - Délégation Paris 5Armando Lira - formerly with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Whitehouse Station, NJRobert A Harrington - Stanford UniversityT Bruce Ferguson - East Carolina Heart Institute, Greenville, NCRED-CABG Executive and Steering Committees
- Publication Details
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, v 148(6), pp 2720-2726.e2
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- [Retired Faculty]
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000345686100064
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-84920126952
- Other Identifier
- 991019169808804721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Industry collaboration
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
- Respiratory System
- Surgery